01/14/2011
Maybe ESPN will take him back...
Keith Olbermann abruptly fired by NBC.
I liked him on ESPN, he was a pretty good sportscaster, on MSNBC it averaged about 30 seconds before I had the urge to throw up...
Posted by: YIH at
11:09 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
01/14/2011
Hmm, let's see if this works...
UPDATE: After some fussin' and cussin' I finally got around the 'net nanny' type program and now I can post pics here! Scroll down to see it.
VA, You will absolutely love it!
Brand new blog, now let's see if I can post pics to it:
The computer I'm using has a ''net nanny'' type program on it.
A VERY strong one in fact, I can't go to AmRen:
VA, You will absolutely love it!
Brand new blog, now let's see if I can post pics to it:
The computer I'm using has a ''net nanny'' type program on it.
A VERY strong one in fact, I can't go to AmRen:
Category Blocked
The site you tried to visit belongs to a category that your computer is set to block.
http://www.amren.com/ is blocked because it is currently categorized as: Not happy about that. I can't put an innocent image on this blog nor can I go to AmRen!k
The 1st Amendment has a reason for being folks!!!
I can go (for now) to VA's blog, and Forum or OA's blog but how long will that last?
If I can't go to AmRen or host even innocent pics:
http://f1141.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=1_4797_1_33443_0_ALKniGIAAVrHTMwxWQHUKDHZc%2F8&fid=%2540S%2540Search&pid=15&clean=0&inline=1
Don't worry, if you can get that URL to work (I couldn't) it's 100% innocent (In fact, if you're a 'cat person' it'll melt your heart)
I don't want this (or any other 'Pro-White') blog to be BLOCKED.
But the liberal that chained me thinks I'm a child. In an employment situation I could support that, it's their computers. An employer can and even should use blocking software.
If you want to BLOCK me, YOU MUST EMPLOY me.
PAY ME!!!
The 1st Amendment has a reason for being folks!!!
I can go (for now) to VA's blog, and Forum or OA's blog but how long will that last?
If I can't go to AmRen or host even innocent pics:
Don't worry, if you can get that URL to work (I couldn't) it's 100% innocent (In fact, if you're a 'cat person' it'll melt your heart)
I don't want this (or any other 'Pro-White') blog to be BLOCKED.
But the liberal that chained me thinks I'm a child. In an employment situation I could support that, it's their computers. An employer can and even should use blocking software.
If you want to BLOCK me, YOU MUST EMPLOY me.
PAY ME!!!
Posted by: YIH at
12:54 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 3 kb.
Wait a minute, I have a blog again...
"More of the same?" I don't disagree. When Steele was made GOP chair I thought "so the Dems have their black President, I guess the GOP needs an 'affirmative action' leader as well".
And that's what he was. I have nothing against anyone when it comes to race, gender, ect.
IF that person can 'make the grade'. For a year and a half I honestly thought you were a guy!
I was kind of embarrassed when you "came out as a woman" (your words).
My point being is you "made the grade"! I liked your blog and your gender became meaningless.
Steele was put in that position purely due to his race and nothing else.
Robert Jindal "made the grade" as Gov. of LA, as you said "the bar is set pretty low for him". But he was capable of stepping over it. As far as I can tell, he's neither incompetent nor corrupt. David Duke couldn't pass 'the corrupt test' and he ran against a guy that openly ADMITTED 'he was a crook'!
That said, I don't think I could support him in a bid for President either unless it was Obama vs. Palin. In that case I would vote for him.
I know you like Gov. Palin, but I don't. When I heard her tell Katie Couric as a reply to the question "What magazines do you read?" she said "All of them".
That's the "FAIL", no one can read "all of them"!
Could she read "all of them" blogs? Even if she did nothing but read and sleep? Not likely...
UPDATE: First, fixed the 'but I don't' link above. Still getting used to this new post editor. In Blogger (and for commenting elsewhere) I generally wrote 'raw HTML' I forgot this won't accept a link wrote that way.
Second, Some suggested I was wrong about Gov. Palin saying 'all of them' when it came to magazines she read. Luckily there is:
http://youtu.be/xRkWebP2Q0Y
Yeah, that's a YouTube link, they have an auto-shorten link function for those who are into Twitter. BTW, I'm not a twit, I don't do Twitter.
UPDATE II: Ok, now I do know how to access it's 'edit HTML' mode, now I can do things like drop in the YouTube video itself into a post.
Now let's see if I can get a pic to work...
And that's what he was. I have nothing against anyone when it comes to race, gender, ect.
IF that person can 'make the grade'. For a year and a half I honestly thought you were a guy!
I was kind of embarrassed when you "came out as a woman" (your words).
My point being is you "made the grade"! I liked your blog and your gender became meaningless.
Steele was put in that position purely due to his race and nothing else.
Robert Jindal "made the grade" as Gov. of LA, as you said "the bar is set pretty low for him". But he was capable of stepping over it. As far as I can tell, he's neither incompetent nor corrupt. David Duke couldn't pass 'the corrupt test' and he ran against a guy that openly ADMITTED 'he was a crook'!
That said, I don't think I could support him in a bid for President either unless it was Obama vs. Palin. In that case I would vote for him.
I know you like Gov. Palin, but I don't. When I heard her tell Katie Couric as a reply to the question "What magazines do you read?" she said "All of them".
That's the "FAIL", no one can read "all of them"!
Could she read "all of them" blogs? Even if she did nothing but read and sleep? Not likely...
UPDATE: First, fixed the 'but I don't' link above. Still getting used to this new post editor. In Blogger (and for commenting elsewhere) I generally wrote 'raw HTML' I forgot this won't accept a link wrote that way.
Second, Some suggested I was wrong about Gov. Palin saying 'all of them' when it came to magazines she read. Luckily there is:
http://youtu.be/xRkWebP2Q0Y
Yeah, that's a YouTube link, they have an auto-shorten link function for those who are into Twitter. BTW, I'm not a twit, I don't do Twitter.
UPDATE II: Ok, now I do know how to access it's 'edit HTML' mode, now I can do things like drop in the YouTube video itself into a post.
Now let's see if I can get a pic to work...
Posted by: YIH at
12:27 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 399 words, total size 3 kb.
I guess I'm back...
I just posted a comment over at my old friend's blog Vanishing American. I suggested that I may begin blogging again but at a new location.
And here I am. I quit blogging in 6/1/07 because of 'writer's block' and the feeling that I did not want to simply parrot the posts of other blogs.
If I wanted to do that I could simply link the blog posts of others, but I would not have much to say of my own. And that would suck.
I'll refer back to my former blog but it will not be updated. Bear with me, this is a new blogging system that I'm still 'cutting my teeth' on. It's not Blogger and I'm not very familiar with the software involved.
So there are going to be glitches, some with the blogging software used here, some with adapting to the new format.
As to comments; I encourage them but some general rules apply:
1. Keep the profanity under control. It's seldom necessary to use it to make a point, and even in quotations it does not need to be blatant (Example: Obama's pastor said "No, no, no, G** d*** America!!!").
2. I generally believe in the 1st Amendment, but it can go to far: If you want to abuse me, I don't mind, I've been through worse, I have a thick skin. If you want to call me a scum-sucking bottom-feeder, go for it! (NOTE: I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY! Sorry, Mr. Roach, I couldn't leave the lawyer joke alone. There is an attorney in Central FL that not only advertises heavily on TV but he also buys an hour on Saturdays to do an 'ask a lawyer' show on three different radio stations! Mr. Roach, you likely know who I mean) as above, profanity is not necessary, if you want to insult me at least be a bit creative about it! Profanity is boring, and reflects badly on the profane.
What is this blog about? I never really defined what the 'old' blog is about, and I'm not about to start now. For right now it's a new start...
And here I am. I quit blogging in 6/1/07 because of 'writer's block' and the feeling that I did not want to simply parrot the posts of other blogs.
If I wanted to do that I could simply link the blog posts of others, but I would not have much to say of my own. And that would suck.
I'll refer back to my former blog but it will not be updated. Bear with me, this is a new blogging system that I'm still 'cutting my teeth' on. It's not Blogger and I'm not very familiar with the software involved.
So there are going to be glitches, some with the blogging software used here, some with adapting to the new format.
As to comments; I encourage them but some general rules apply:
1. Keep the profanity under control. It's seldom necessary to use it to make a point, and even in quotations it does not need to be blatant (Example: Obama's pastor said "No, no, no, G** d*** America!!!").
2. I generally believe in the 1st Amendment, but it can go to far: If you want to abuse me, I don't mind, I've been through worse, I have a thick skin. If you want to call me a scum-sucking bottom-feeder, go for it! (NOTE: I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY! Sorry, Mr. Roach, I couldn't leave the lawyer joke alone. There is an attorney in Central FL that not only advertises heavily on TV but he also buys an hour on Saturdays to do an 'ask a lawyer' show on three different radio stations! Mr. Roach, you likely know who I mean) as above, profanity is not necessary, if you want to insult me at least be a bit creative about it! Profanity is boring, and reflects badly on the profane.
What is this blog about? I never really defined what the 'old' blog is about, and I'm not about to start now. For right now it's a new start...
Posted by: YIH at
01:06 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 359 words, total size 2 kb.
01/14/2011
Testing, testing, 3-2-1
Well let's see how this shakes out, shall we?
Posted by: YIH at
12:48 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
25kb generated in CPU 0.0104, elapsed 0.0511 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0428 seconds, 72 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
34 queries taking 0.0428 seconds, 72 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
